![]() Allowing people to swap in a few mgs or sl's here or there is totally legit. And the game developers have done that as well. Thus a Hunchback 4G should have 1 big AC spot on its LT (or is RT?) to maintain the 'flavor of the mech'. And i sympathize with that point as well. Now, there is the camp that says i want a X ton 4/6 mech A to look different from X ton 4/6 mech B and the only way to do that is by enforcing hardpoints. To that end, the introduction of the hardpoints that are in the GAME RIGHT NOW prevent you from building the BJ-1 you just described. What i reject is your hardline view of hardpoint 'purity' - there IS NO PURITY - the concept of hardpoints is a new game mechanic introduced after tabletop in order to constrain the worst minmaxing abuses of mech designs. Thus, i support the inclusion of the hardpoint concept. Hardpoints were an effort to stop people from being able to abuse the rules in a minmax way like you describe. It cannot be salvaged.Click to expand.No - because hardpoints dont exist in tabletop - that would be totally legit. ![]() ** Custom BattleMech that will be deployed as part of the enemy lance for Mason's Marauders in the second mission of the "Bourbon
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |